A quick note regarding our recent Ghost vs WordPress post…
Having once met in person and corresponded with John O’Nolan (the original founder of Ghost) via email a number of times, I figured it would be an interesting thing to do to shoot him a quick email mentioning our recent “Ghost vs WordPress” article in order to see what he thought of it.
Luckily, he seemed game and was also kind enough to add a little extra information regarding the comparison between the two hosted versions, i.e. WordPress.com and Ghost(Pro).
Here’s what he had to say — in his own words (published here with permission):
“One really interesting point is that WordPress.com and Ghost(Pro) aren’t actually comparable – this is a very common misconception, so I don’t blame you at all for making it! Ghost(Pro) is, in fact, almost exactly like WP Engine or FlyWheel. This is a really important distinction, here’s why:
WordPress.com / Medium / Tumblr are all 1 big app, with multi-tenant installs.
- Advantage: It keeps costs down, so you can offer millions of free accounts to everyone at minimal cost.
- Drawback: All sites are linked, so you can never (ever) allow 3rd party code. If one user installs a bad theme or plugin, the entire could potentially come unstuck.
Ghost(Pro) / WP Engine / FlyWheel are all managed software as a service, so every single site is a unique application.
- Advantage: Every site is independent, can run *any* code, and can scale whenever it needs to.
- Drawback: This is a much more sophisticated platform which is expensive to run, so no free accounts.
So in WordPress-land, WP.com is only ever used by beginners, because it’s (in essence) similar to a social network in which you have very little control over anything. People eventually “graduate” to self-hosting WordPress when they get serious about their site.
The point of Ghost(Pro) is to combine these concepts into one platform: It’s easy to use for beginners thanks to its 1-click setup, and it’s also a fully-managed service for professional users, too. Because there’s no official WP equivalent like this, there’s often chatter about Ghost “not being easy to host” — which is something that’s just far less relevant when there’s already a world-class official hosted service.
If you want to host Ghost yourself, you can. But in Ghost-land, you really don’t have to. Best of all, the entire project is funded by people who use the official platform.”
– which is something I for one — and I’ll bet many others too — had pretty much failed to realize (and hence I thought it worth this extra post in order to help clarify).
Thanks John.
All comments are held for moderation. We'll only publish comments that are on topic and adhere to our Commenting Policy.
Our commenting form also supports the use of Markdown.